FLETC Podcast: Phasing Out Use of Force Continuums

by Matt on November 15, 2010

John Bostain of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) has been the leading proponent for abolishing Use of Force Continuums. This 15 minute podcast is an excellent summary of his position. FLETC also transcribed the podcast if you would rather read it.

John Bostain:

Each continuum has its own general categories of subject actions. They include phrases such as passive resistance, verbal non-compliance, active resistance, assaultive, grievous bodily harm, you get the point. The problem is that there is no universal agreement on how to define each of these terms. Active resistance to one officer may appear passive to another, and may even appear assaultive to another. These types of inconsistencies may cause an officer to unnecessarily hesitate as he tries to pigeonhole a subject’s actions into a specific definition on a Use of Force continuum. Use of Force continuums are a cognitive tool, and they’re not very useful in the rapidly evolving dynamics of a critical incident.

(via Fred Leland at LESC)

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Tim Zuniga November 23, 2010 at 1:25 pm

I am a DT instructor. I use the continuum model. I have no problem with it. However, when I read this article and I hear them describe how they teach, it is about the same way we use the continuum.

I don’t think continuums are the problem. It depends on how they are taught.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

' methodology for dissertation dissertation online phd dissertations psychology dissertation writing services writing dissertation methodology