Officer Created Jeopardy: Defining the Problem

by Matt on September 8, 2009

What is “officer created jeopardy”?

It can be defined as a situation where an officer deviates from established tactics or policies and his behavior unnecessarily places him (and/or others) at greater risk of harm because of his actions. For example, an officer stepping in front of a fleeing vehicle and then shooting because he is now in danger of being run over.

Police work is a dangerous business. There are times when we will have to place ourselves in danger to save someone else. However, we have set procedures and proven tactics that are designed to reduce our risks and stack the deck in our favor. We all agree that the first rule of policing is to go home alive at the end of the shift. Unfortunately, police officers are human beings and will occasionally make mistakes. To improve ourselves, our fellow officers, and our employees (if you are in a supervisory position) while attempting to eliminate unnecessary risks, we should review and then de-brief minor and major use of force incidents, identifying both the good performances and the poor decision making in an effort to learn from them.

Why do many agencies ignore and sometimes even reward poor decision making on the street? Perhaps it is because many administrators tend to be result-oriented, subscribing to the “no harm, no foul” theory of management. The major problem with this theory is that poor tactics on one call can soon become bad habits duplicated on all calls, which are then mimicked by other officers and spread throughout the agency. Young officers learn through mental scenarios and watching the actions of more seasoned officers. They are taught to visual situations that they may face on the street so that they can make some pre-decisions to speed them through their OODA loop in the face of potential danger. Allowing poor decision making to go unchecked in your agency may send a signal to your other employees that the undesirable behavior was actually condoned by the department.

In 2005, Major Steve Ijames (ret.) wrote an article for Police One, Managing Officer Created Jeopardy. In the article, he specifically mentions situations involving mentally deranged subjects who are armed, but the theory is valid for a wide variety of tactical errors that are made by officers on a seemingly daily basis.

One of the most common tactical errors that officers make involves the failure to conduct a felony stop at the end of a vehicle pursuit. This issue increases two types of jeopardy for the officers involved: physical safety and career longevity.

  1. Physical safety – Taking a suspect into custody at the end of a vehicle pursuit can expose officers to many risks, but the potential for injury can be mitigated by performing a felony stop. Each year, officers are killed or seriously injured when they fail to conduct a felony stop and approach a suspect vehicle at the end of a pursuit.
  2. Career longevity – During a pursuit, officers can experience high levels of stress and excitement which can cause them to over react to low levels of resistance. A felony stop can act as a cooling off period, where officers are able to recover from the adrenaline rush while maintaining a tactically superior position. Rushing up to a suspect vehicle at the end of a pursuit while adrenaline levels are high, can increase the chances of an officer using an unreasonable amount of force. Since the vast majority of pursuits are captured on video, mistakes made at this point can end an officer’s career.

I am embarrassed to admit that I have made this same mistake more than once during my career. I was fortunate not to be injured during these lapses in judgment. Sadly, I was only counseled once for this tactical error, but it did have an effect on me. However, because I was talked to privately, no one else learned from my mistake. I had a friend who failed to conduct a felony stop at the end of a pursuit and found himself getting fired over an excessive force complaint that may have been avoided if he had abided by our standard procedure. A neighboring agency had an officer killed when he failed to perform a felony stop at the end of a pursuit. He was shot as he approached the suspect’s vehicle on foot. There are countless examples of officer created jeopardy, and far too few examples of the poor decisions being corrected so that others can learn from them.

In part 2 of this series, I will discuss ways that we can correct officers’ errors in judgment, so that we can begin to control officer created jeopardy in our departments.

Please take the time to post a comment and share your own examples of officer created jeopardy. I would like to begin a list of common mistakes so that we can all benefit from each other’s experience.

Related posts:

  1. Recommended Police Use of Force Articles: January 2010 Every couple of weeks I link to the most recent...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

{ 1 trackback }

Video: Firearms Training for Contact Shots
September 11, 2009 at 12:58 pm

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

Fred Leland September 8, 2009 at 6:28 pm

Time being made an issue when its not an issue, such as: rushing in and reckless responses, lack of awareness, complacency, just plain tired, lazy, poor attitude, EGO and failure to turn on, intensify or turn up your Boyd Cycle. Failure to act on obsrvations, orientation and decisons all contribute to officer created jeopardy. I have experienced them all and continue to learn-unlearn and relearn at how to effectively combat this phenomenon in myself and in others.

I will take exception with the definition a specific part of it “deviates from established tactics or policies” sometimes deviation is what is needed and failure to deviate, or failure to adapt tactics based on circumstances creates jeopardy. Policies that remove initiative from the frontline officers can be dangerous as well.

Understanding tactics is both art and science and applying tactics from yesterdays battle to todays is a critcal decision to be made that affects outcomes and officer created jeopardy.

I love the article and its message to observe- orient-decide and act and never be embarrassed to admit mistakes and errors we make. Its one way of preventing the same errors from happening again and deminishing the consequences of “Officer Created Jeopardy!

OUTSTANDING!

Stay Oriented!

Fred

Fred Leland September 8, 2009 at 6:36 pm

Sorry i forgot to mention I am looking forward to part two as well.

Fred

Jerry September 8, 2009 at 9:49 pm

Great article, this is an on-going (handed down from generation to generation) problem in many areas. Getting too close to someone with a loaded firearm is one of my pet pieves. Be it from too much TV or seeing the old heads do it, there are still cops out there making physical contact by using the gun barrel to make a point (pun intended). The phrase “I screwed my gun in his ear” and he understood I meant business comes to mind. Anyway you are spot on about not correcting a problem and it becoming a bigger problem. Doing it wrong and having a good outcome is a long way from doing it right.

Jerry

Fred Leland September 9, 2009 at 6:42 am

Jerry great point. Our police culture and belief system is a killer for cops on the street. Especially if we are closed minded and unwilling to use our own insight and innovation into solving the vast array of problems and crisies we face.

There was a great article out there a couple of years back called the “Hollywood Effect” i believe was the title, which spoke of how those we protect view our tactcis and actions. Sometimes I wonder if we as cops get our methods and techniques from the same place. To be safe and effective out there we need to open our minds and allow the strategic and tactical mind to rule how we operate from the frontline all the way up.

Matt September 10, 2009 at 4:25 pm

Fred and Jerry,

Thank you both for the great comments! I think everyone benefits from your experience.

Stay safe,
Matt

Scott September 11, 2009 at 1:16 am

The article Fred mentions is called Use of Force and the Hollywood Factor. It is an excellent article that I would highly recommend, just click on the link to read it. As both Fred and Jerry mention, it appears we often follow what we have unconsciously learned in movies and popular culture rather than consciously evaluating our actions and what effects they might have.

Great observations from both of you. Thanks for contributing to the discussion.

Fred Leland September 12, 2009 at 9:22 am

That the one. Outstanding and eye opening. This post has given me my idea for inservice training of veteran cops this year…Officer Created Jeopardy

Thanks for the work you guys are doing.

Atticus Finch September 12, 2009 at 6:54 pm

Leave a Comment

Previous post: The Gunfighting Lessons of Unforgiven

Next post: Video: Firearms Training for Contact Shots